Theological Red Flags
Over the last twenty years (and then some), my faith has shifted and transformed in more ways than I can count. I began to notice, in my early twenties, that the theologies and interpretations I had inheritedāand assumed to be The Capital-T Truthāwere not the only options, or even the most satisfying.
That realization led to a kind of renovationāa change in perspective and understanding that has shaped who Iāve become, not only as a pastor and writer, but on a deeply personal, human level.
As a byproduct of that process, Iāve learned there are certain theological phrases that immediately raise red flags for me. Most of these used to be in my own vocabulary during a previous season of life and ministry. While theyāre often well-intendedāand seemingly harmless, if a bit clichĆ©āI now recognize that they can do real harm to those on the receiving end. They heap more guilt, shame, and fear on people who are often already carrying too much.
Hereās a rule of thumb Iāve picked up along the way:
Good theology liberates and heals.
Bad theology oppresses and harms.
Recently, I was in an online conversation where one of those red-flag phrases came up, and it jumpstarted my brain: What are some other phrases that trigger my theological āspideysenseā? So hereās a (non-exhaustive) list of Theological Red Flags that popped up for me:
āThe Bible is clearā¦ā
There are over 40,000+ Christian denominations. That wouldnāt be the case if āthe Bible was clearā about⦠well, anything. What seems clear to me isnāt necessarily clear to others, and pretending otherwise shuts down conversation and ignores the complexity of Scripture.
āThe Bible saysā¦ā
This one usually precedes a statement thatās quoting a text and interpreting it to mean one specific thing. But hereās the truth: the Bible doesnāt āsayā anything on its own. It reads. And we make it say things through our interpretations of the text.
āYou gotta have faithā¦ā
This isnāt on the list because I have an issue with faith as an idea. Itās here because, for many Christians, āhaving faithā means believing things to be literally true, factual, and historicalāeven when those things stretch the bounds of credibility and ignore literary genre and cultural context.
In that framework, āfaithā often becomes believing things that are hard to believe. And if those things (like a literal six-day creation, or Jonah living in a fish for three days/nights) turn out not to be true, then the whole faith system collapses.
But hereās the good news: faith doesnāt mean believing the unbelievable. It means trust. And trust doesnāt require literalismāit is an invitation to confidence in God.
āEverything happens for a reasonā¦ā
While usually offered with kind intentionsāespecially in moments of grief or confusionāthis phrase tends to make tragedy even more painful. It suggests that suffering is part of some divine plan. But God doesnāt need, cause, or orchestrate human pain.
āGod never gives you more than you can handleā¦ā
This one builds on the last. It paints a picture of God as a micromanagerāsending people to the brink of collapse, but not quite breaking them. Thatās not just unhelpful; itās toxic and cruel. I donāt believe God puts suffering on us to test us or ābuild character.ā
For a more expansive and satisfying approach to these questions, I recommend the work of Thomas J. Oord on Open and Relational Theology.
āLove the sinner, hate the sinā¦ā
Letās be honest: this phrase is used 100% of the time to justify the exclusion of the LGBTQ+ community. Itās toxic, dehumanizing, and needs to be retired.
Sure, people sin. But letās be clear: being LGBTQ+ is NOT a sin.
āPreach the gospel, not politicsā¦ā
This statement assumes the gospel is purely spiritual and evacuationistāsomething thatās about getting to heaven someday, not about how we live in this world now.
But the gospel is inherently political. The word itself was used in the Roman world to describe imperial announcements, like the birth of Caesar or a key Roman victory in battle . For Jesus and his followers to co-opt the word āgospelā was itself a political act. They were saying: There is another kingdom; another way of organizing our common life together.
The gospel is good news for the poor.
It confronts systems of power and injustice.
If itās not political, itās not the gospel.
Those are just a few of my theological red flags. Iām sure there are more.
What about you? Are there phrases or ideas that set off your alarm bells?
Share yours in the comments š


also... love (love, love) this quote:
Good theology liberates and heals.
Bad theology oppresses and harms.
So true!!
āWhat doesnāt kill your makes you strongerā While not explicitly theological, this phrase was often used in my theologically conservative family of origin to minimize legitimate hurt, pain, and sufferingāthings which are uncomfortable to address since God is supposed to be in control.